Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Nicolas Lapentti Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L L L
Form
W L W L W L L L L LH2H: Gimeno-Traver 2 - 2 Lapentti
They have played 11 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 6 and Lapentti winning 5. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Lapentti was at the Estoril Open - Estoril, 04-05-2010, First, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory 6-3 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 2 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | 2 |
Estoril Open - Estoril(04-05-2010)
6
3
3
1
| Gimeno-Traver | Stats | Lapentti |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 48 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 39 | Age | 48 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 10 |
| 57% (625-479) | Career Total W/L | 55% (443-366) |
| $1,102,200 | Career Prize Money | $454,170 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Samsonova VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gimeno-Traver VS Lapentti H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Nicolas Lapentti
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
124)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
63 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | |||||
Gimeno-Traver VS Lapentti H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 56 | Games Won | 56 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 59% (101/172) | 1st Serve % | 57% (80/140) |
| 54% (55/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (44/80) |
| 48% (34/71) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (30/60) |
| 56% (9/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (10/25) |
| 47% (66/140) | Return Points Win % | 48% (83/172) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolas Lapentti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Dent
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
81 of
123)
9
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Santiago Giraldo
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
83%
(
77 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Melzer
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Lapentti
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan-Sebastian Cabal
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Lapentti
Player
Sebastian Decoud
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roger Federer
Player
Nicolas Lapentti
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Lapentti
Player
Potito Starace
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (625/479) | Win/Loss | 55% (443/366) |
| 54% (1415/1184) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1103/998) |
| 52% (12975/12022) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (10360/9980) |
| 34% (29/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (116/111) |
| 61% (578/369) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (275/186) |
| 27% (12/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (41/50) |
| 21% (6/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2684 | Aces Total | 612 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 2209 | Total Double Faults | 321 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 586.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.06 |
| 59% (29576/49868) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8044/12962) |
| 70% (20559/29576) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5525/8007) |
| 50% (10099/20308) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2350/4902) |
| 42% (2075/4983) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (465/1161) |
| 39% (19916/50722) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4791/12644) |
| 30% (17/40) | Slam W/L | 47% (44/50) |
| 46% (31/36) | Masters W/L | 49% (85/89) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 69% (29/13) |
| 47% (140/159) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (192/169) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 61% (343/219) | Challenger W/L | 71% (92/38) |
| 81% (92/21) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (605/1050) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (366/668) |
| 28% (11/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (72/134) |
| 47% (175/372) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (157/298) |
| 55% (196/355) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (162/280) |
| 87% (597/521) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (401/335) |
| 12% (597/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (401/66) |
| 20% (505/100) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (407/107) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
